Special offer for new customers: 5% OFF your first order! Use coupon: GWRITERSclose

Norbäck and Persson (2014) suggest that some firms are “born to be global firms,” like Google and Facebook.

Norbäck and Persson (2014) suggest that some firms are “born to be global firms,” like Google and Facebook. Others, however, sell themselves and their innovations to incumbent firms. The authors argue that both strategies can be beneficial, depending upon the market. How do the authors’ findings align with Peng’s five entrepreneurial strategies? Do Norback and Persson’s assertions complement or contradict Peng’s? What are the implications for small, new, innovative firms
——————————————————————————
Use APA style guidelines, citing references as appropriate.

Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Norbäck and Persson (2014) suggest that some firms are “born to be global firms,” like Google and Facebook.

Norbäck and Persson (2014) suggest that some firms are “born to be global firms,” like Google and Facebook. Others, however, sell themselves and their innovations to incumbent firms. The authors argue that both strategies can be beneficial, depending upon the market. How do the authors’ findings align with Peng’s five entrepreneurial strategies? Do Norback and Persson’s assertions complement or contradict Peng’s? What are the implications for small, new, innovative firms
——————————————————————————
Use APA style guidelines, citing references as appropriate.

Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.
Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes