Leadership Styles for Different SituationsOn the other hand, leaders have followers, but not subordinates. They also focus on inspiring people to achieve their objectives through charismatic and transformational styles. They also focus on helping and empowering individuals. Most of the leaders have humble backgrounds, but with plenty of wisdom and courage to take risks. While managers focus on maintaining stability and managing work and organizational tasks, leaders focus on initiating change and leading people. The authority of the manager comes from formal authority while that of the leader comes from personal charisma. Nevertheless, the two concepts have a lot in common and are often viewed as complimentary. They both involve helping people achieve greater objectives, efficient management of available resources, and working towards desired objectives. Delta Plc has both powerful individuals playing the roles of leaders and managers. For instance, the managers execute the companys strategic goals at higher levels of the organization. They focus on guiding subordinate employees towards helping the bank achieve its goals. On the other hand, leaders within the organization consist of different charismatic individuals in charge of various projects in the company or team leaders. These leaders play a vital role in the organization as they use their leadership skills to inspire others under them to achieve more. 2.3: Comparison of Leadership Styles for Different Situations The recruitment process at Delta Plc faced a lot of challenges, like in most other companies of this nature. This called for great leadership to take charge of different situations that arose at different times and stages of the recruitment process to ensure all the objectives were met. Some of the challenges encountered during the process include conflicts between members of the recruitment team, differences in setting key objectives of the process, competition among the individuals in the recruitment team, and challenges in assigning roles and making critical decisions to move the process forward. These challenges represent different phases during the recruitment process, which required good leadership. In the first instance when setting objectives for the recruitment process, members failed to agree on the specific issues. However, it was discovered that the differences in opinions case as a result of differences in experience, knowledge, and skills of conducting the recruitment process since the team consisted of both first time members and experienced individuals. Since this was a crucial stage in the process, it required an experienced individual with sufficient knowledge of the intricacies in the selection process. Therefore, the most appropriate leadership style in this situation was a visionary leadership so as to clearly set the desired goals for the entire process. Conflicts and disagreements also featured prominently in the process. For instance, when people expressed different opinions on different candidates as well as in the decision making process. Therefore, the most appropriate form of leadership was democratic leadership which ensured that each member contributed sufficiently in the recruitment process. 3.2: Working in a Team as a Leader and Member towards Specific Goals, Dealing With Any Conflicts or Difficult Situations Working as a team leader in an organization can be a daunting task or role to play. For a big organization such as Delta Plc, team leaders play a vital role in ensuring all projects are completed in time as well as execution of various other mandates related to the companys strategic goals. Being a leader and a member of the recruitment team in the company was a very challenging task. The HR personnel was in charge of leading the interview and selection process, while also making significant contributions in other steps in the recruitment process, including the job description process, profiling, and job advertising. Therefore, as the HR manager played both roles of a leader and a member of the recruitment team. The role played as the leader of the team entailed leading team meetings, organizing and scheduling projects within the team, allocating duties and responsibilities to team members, and ensuring that the teams achieve their objectives within the time required.