The DARE Program and its effectiveness and continued funding has become a source of heated public debate over the past few years, as the program frequently becomes a target of budget cuts, despite its huge popularity with parents. The program is often cited as ineffective in reducing drug usage by those graduating from the program.

Write a 2-3 page paper. Address the following in your paper:

1. Should the DARE Program be discontinued? Why or why not?
2. Are there any other unintended consequences of the DARE Program that should be considered when the program is assessed? If so, what are they and why are they important to consider?

You MUST use a total of 3-5 references provided along with one from the Internet and not Wikipedia. Please adhere to the APA format when writing and submitting papers. Papers should be grammatically correct. Lastly, avoid first person and contractions in your paper. You can provide an opinion without using “I think” statements

1. …

LAW
1. Marshall v. Barlow and Dow v. U.S.

You will be assigned to write an essay analyzing, justifying, and harmonizing the results of Marshall v. Barlow and Dow v. U.S.
Respond to all of the following elements:
• Briefly describe the facts of each case, including any constitutional, statutory, and/or regulatory issues raised in each case. (1-2)
• Discuss the factual and legal similarities of each case and then discuss their factual and legal differences (1-2 pages)
• Describe the precedent set by the oldest case and how or whether it has been impacted by the decision in the later court decision.
• Do you agree with the outcomes of either or both of these cases? Explain why or why not.
• Write a brief explanation (1-2 pages) explaining to the general public why these two cases may seem similar but the court’s decision in each case was justifiable and consistent in its judicial logic.

LAW
1. Marshall v. Barlow and Dow v. U.S.

You will be assigned to write an essay analyzing, justifying, and harmonizing the results of Marshall v. Barlow and Dow v. U.S.
Respond to all of the following elements:
• Briefly describe the facts of each case, including any constitutional, statutory, and/or regulatory issues raised in each case. (1-2)
• Discuss the factual and legal similarities of each case and then discuss their factual and legal differences (1-2 pages)
• Describe the precedent set by the oldest case and how or whether it has been impacted by the decision in the later court decision.
• Do you agree with the outcomes of either or both of these cases? Explain why or why not.
• Write a brief explanation (1-2 pages) explaining to the general public why these two cases may seem similar but the court’s decision in each case was justifiable and consistent in its judicial logic.