Topic: Jurisprudence
Order Description
Question: What is the semantic sting? Is it fatal, as Dworkin alleges, to semantic theories of law?
Word limit: 3,000 words not including bibliography and not including footnotes. Footnotes must contain only citations and not text. Oxford style.
Recommended referencing :
Ronald Dworkin, Laws Empire (Oxford: Hart, 1998)
Penner, Schiff and Nobles eds Jurisprudence and Legal Theory: Commentary and Materials , Chapter 10(London, Butterworths, 2002)
Ronald Dworkin Social Rules (Models of Rules II) (81 Yale. L.J. 855 1971-1972)
Ronald Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously (London: Bloomsbury, 1997)
Ronald Dworkin, A Matter of Principle (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1985)
Ronald Dworkin Justice in Robes (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2006)
Robert Alexy, The Argument from Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism (Oxford: OUP, 2002)
Justine Burley ed. Dworkin and his Critics: with replies by Dworkin (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2004)
Emilios Christodoulidis, End of History Jurisprudence: Dworkin in South Africa (2004) Acta Juridica 64
Marshall Cohen ed Ronald Dworkin and Contemporary Jurisprudence (London: Duckworth, 1983)
David Dyzenhaus, Hard Cases in Wicked Legal Systems, 2nd ed. (Oxford: OUP, 2010)
R Fallon In memoriam: Ronald Dworkin 127 Harvard Law Review 489 (2013)
J Finnis On Reason and Authority in Laws Empire 6 Law and Philosophy 357 (1987)
Stephen Guest Ronald Dworkin (Stanford: Stanford Law Books, 2013)
Alan Hunt ed. Reading Dworkin Critically (New York: Berg, 1992)
Sheldon Leader Impartiality, Bias, and the Judiciary in Hunt ed above
Brian Leiter The End of Empire: Dworkin and Twenty-first Century Jurisprudence 36 Rutgers Law Rev. (2004) 165
JL Mackie The Third Theory of Law Philosophy & Public Affairs 7:1, (1977)
J Raz Dworkin: a New Link in the Chain 74 California Law Review 1103 (1986)
Arthur Ripstein, Ronald Dworkin (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007)
Raymond Wacks, Judges and Injustice (1984) 101 South African Law Journal 266