Administrative Responsibility in the Public Sector Environment

Chapter 7
1. Please evaluate the political decisions that were made in each case and the moral issues that surround such decisions.

Reference:

Gutmann, A. & Thompson, D. (2006.) Ethics and Politics Cases & Comments (4thed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.

—-

The name of the book to be used as a reference is: Gutmann, A. & Thompson, D. (2006.) Ethics and Politics Cases & Comments (4thed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth. and I want the following question to be answered from chapter 7, ( 1-2 ) Pages no more thantwo pages please. Chapter 7 1. Please evaluate the political decisions that were made in each case and the moral issues that surround such decisions.

Order Description
Please the only book will be used as a reference is:

Gutmann, A. & Thompson, D. (2006.) Ethics and Politics Cases & Comments (4thed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.

The questions as follows:

Chapter 4
1. Do the advertisements go too far in manipulating voters?
2. Was Lyndon Johnson the “master manipulator” and was Al Gore morally self-
indulgent? Please discuss.

Chapter 5
1. Compare and contrast the Otepka and Ellsberg cases.
2. Is George Shultz a moral contradiction?
3. Was Agent Rowley disloyal to the government because she was a whistleblower?
4. Should the Columbia mission have benefitted from the Challenger’s failures vis-à-vis
blowing the whistle? Please explain.

Order Description
Please the only book will be used as a reference is:

Gutmann, A. & Thompson, D. (2006.) Ethics and Politics Cases & Comments (4thed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.

The questions as follows:

Chapter 4
1. Do the advertisements go too far in manipulating voters?
2. Was Lyndon Johnson the “master manipulator” and was Al Gore morally self-
indulgent? Please discuss.

Chapter 5
1. Compare and contrast the Otepka and Ellsberg cases.
2. Is George Shultz a moral contradiction?
3. Was Agent Rowley disloyal to the government because she was a whistleblower?
4. Should the Columbia mission have benefitted from the Challenger’s failures vis-à-vis
blowing the whistle? Please explain.